‘To See Takes Time’ avoids this critical hang-up by neither referencing her reception nor including any of her more lurid stamens. In place of her vision, critics, with a new passion for sloppy Freudianism, saw cunts in the callas: ‘Well – I made you take time to look at what I saw and when you took time to really notice my flower, you hung all your own associations with flowers on my flower and you write about my flower as if I think and see what you think and see of the flower – and I don’t.’ If I could paint the flower exactly as I see it no one would see what I see because I would paint it small like the flower is small.’ O’Keeffe had been trying, by way of enlargement and by dignifying her own attention, not to represent the flower, but to coerce the viewer to participate in the time she spent considering it. Courtesy: © 2023 Georgia O’Keeffe Museum / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New Yorkīut what? In her original artist’s statement, titled ‘About Myself’, O’Keeffe recommended not seriality, but stopping to smell the roses: ‘Still – in a way – nobody sees a flower – really – it is so small – we haven’t time – and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. Georgia O’Keeffe, Blue Lines X, 1916, watercolor and pencil on paper, 64 × 48 cm. By emphasising procedure, materiality and small differences, this repetition of figure makes something visible. ![]() The title comes from her catalogue text for a 1939 ‘Exhibition of Oil and Pastels’, and suggests the organising concept: that her ‘serial’ work creates the temporal conditions for really seeing. ‘Georgia O’Keeffe: To See Takes Time’ focuses on the artist’s iterative pastel, charcoal and watercolour works, with a few exceptions made for oil paintings on canvas that extend a paper-based series. Okay, that last bit is false – in the interview, which postdates O’Keeffe’s line about vision’s duration by four decades, Warhol just changes the subject – but it rings about as true as the phrase’s use as the title of MoMA’s current show. Warhol insists she see it anyway, but she won’t budge – after all, to see takes time. O’KEEFFE: Well, I didn’t think what he created was the most beautiful woman in the world.’ He said you were the most beautiful woman in the world. ‘HAMILTON: You shouldn’t criticize Philip Johnson. Warhol recommended she visit the new AT&T building, but she refused, since the architect of 550 Madison Avenue ‘wasn’t really a talent’: Having overseen Hamilton’s curation, O’Keeffe also authorised the inclusion of her dead husband’s famous portraits of herself, or of the self that she and those images co-constructed: a few years earlier in The New Yorker, Janet Malcolm wrote that ‘so strong is the identification of O’Keeffe with her photographed likeness that the photographs have seemed to belong among her works rather than among Stieglitz’s.’ While O’Keeffe was in town, she and Hamilton spoke with Andy Warhol for Interview magazine. The most common UK species, black garden ants, don’t have as much written about their odour because they don’t release either acidic formic acid or name-definingly stinky ketones.At 96, Georgia O’Keeffe – supported by her young companion, Juan Hamilton – came to New York for the 1983 Alfred Stieglitz retrospective at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Scientists have discovered that not only do ants release a scent when they’re distressed or dead, but that different ants from different places have their own aromas – though having taken a whiff of our own Great British Ants on multiple occasions, I don’t reckon Jo Malone will be inspired to release a perfume line.Īpparently, North American formica ants smell of vinegary-y, tart formic acid, while Canadian odorous house ants (see! It’s in the literal name!) have more of a blue cheese scent thanks to the methyl ketones they excrete when squashed. ![]() It’s important to share your biases, so let me say now – I’ve always been able to smell ants, and I’m absolutely staggered to find out that this trait isn’t universal.Īnd, in case you’re one of the alleged scentless wonders, the replies are about right. The smell is this sort of damp, mouldy scent in my experience, with an acidic, acrid finish.īlue cheese is a pretty good comparison, but to me, it’s most like a moth-infested wardrobe (though, can the non-ant smellers even pick that up?! I feel like one of those fish that can see colours humans can’t even imagine right now).Īnd while incredulous Tweets on both side abound, it turns out (in typical Internet fashion) that both sides are wrong. Getting absolutely dragged for admitting I can smell ants.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |